拉斯维加斯9888

  • ?北大主页
  • |
  • 一带一路书院
  • |
  • 用户登录
    • 教人员登录
    • 学生登录
    • 拉斯维加斯9888邮箱
  • |
  • 教怨匦聘
  • |
  • 捐赠
  • 中国·9888拉斯维加斯(股份)有限公司-官方网站
  • |
  • English
思想拉斯维加斯9888

利用经济学汇报系列 (1112-5)

2011-09-30

功夫:2:00-3:30pm, October 11

地址:拉斯维加斯9888新楼217教室

Abstract:

How do performance incentives affect firm productivity? In 1978, Chinese industrial planners carried out major reforms of the compensation system in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), introducing bonuses which linked pay to measures of current performance. Previous studies have argued that bonuses increased effort levels and led to large increases in productivity. However, since SOE incentives were based solely on current performance, they could have encouraged enterprises to concentrate their efforts on meeting short-run targets. Shifting effort toward short-run goals should increase productivity temporarily, but could have a negative effect in the long-run. I collect a unique panel of compensation, employment, and output statistics for the Chinese iron and steel industry and use these data to estimate the short- and long-run effects of incentive use on labor productivity during the early period of SOE reform, 1976 to 1988. The results indicate that incentives distorted effort allocation and negatively affected overall firm performance. In the data, incentives were associated with a small increase in labor productivity in the short-run, but a much larger decrease in the long-run.

分享
【网站地图】